EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case C-499/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Symvoulio tis Epikrateias (Greece) lodged on 1 October 2020 — DIMCO Dimovasili M.I.K.E. v Ypourgos Perivallontos kai Energeias

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62020CN0499

62020CN0499

October 1, 2020
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

14.12.2020

Official Journal of the European Union

C 433/37

(Case C-499/20)

(2020/C 433/46)

Language of the case: Greek

Referring court

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: DIMCO Dimovasili M.I.K.E.

Defendant: Ypourgos Perivallontos kai Energeias

Questions referred

Must Articles 4(1.1), 7(4) and 8 of Directive 97/23/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 May 1997 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States concerning pressure equipment (OJ 1997 L 181), read in combination with Annex I to that Directive, be interpreted as meaning that they preclude national regulations, such as the contested paragraphs 1.2.4, P9.5.6.9 and P9.5.8.2 of the Greek Technical Regulation for Gas Installations with an operating pressure of up to 0.5 bar, which impose conditions and restrictions as to the installation method used for pressure equipment (gas pipes), such as compulsory ventilation and a ban on underfloor pipe lines, in order to protect persons, primarily from earthquakes, especially where those conditions and restrictions also apply indiscriminately to pipes which, as in this case, have the CE marking and which the manufacturer guarantees can be safely installed and used without complying with the abovementioned conditions and restrictions?

Or, conversely, must the above provisions of Directive 97/23/ΕC, read in combination with Article 2 of the Directive, be interpreted as meaning that they do not preclude conditions and restrictions as to the installation method used for pressure equipment (gas pipes), such as those at issue in this case?

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia