I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-406/11) (<span class="super note-tag">1</span>)
((State aid - Provisions concerning corporate tax allowing undertakings which are tax resident in Spain to amortise the goodwill resulting from the acquisition of shareholdings in undertakings which are tax resident abroad - Decision declaring the aid to be incompatible with the internal market and ordering its recovery - Concept of State aid - Selectivity - Reference system - Derogation - Difference in treatment - Justification of the difference in treatment - Undertakings benefiting from the measure - Legitimate expectations))
(2019/C 25/46)
Language of the case: Spanish
Applicant: Prosegur Compañía de Seguridad, SA (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: initially, J. Buendía Sierra, E. Abad Valdenebro and M. Muñoz de Juan, and, subsequently, J. Buendía Sierra, E. Abad Valdenebro, R. Calvo Salinero and A. Lamadrid de Pablo, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: R. Lyal, C. Urraca Caviedes and P. Němečková, acting as Agents)
Application based on Article 263 TFEU and seeking annulment of Article 1(1) and Article 4 of Commission Decision 2011/282/EU of 12 January 2011 on the tax amortisation of financial goodwill for foreign shareholding acquisitions No C 45/07 (ex NN 51/07, ex CP 9/07) implemented by Spain (OJ 2011 L 135, p. 1).
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Prosegur Compañía de Seguridad, SA to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission.
(<span class="note">1</span>) OJ C 282, 24.9.2011.