- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-651/24: Action brought on 16 December 2024 – Eti v EUIPO – Dr. Oetker RO (Poof!...and done)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62024TN0651
62024TN0651
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
EN
C series
—
C/2025/1114
(Case T-651/24)
(C/2025/1114)
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Parties
Applicant: Eti Gıda Sanayi ve Ticaret AŞ (Eskişehir, Türkiye) (represented by: A. Căvescu, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Dr. Oetker RO (Curtea de Arges, Romania)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Trade mark at issue: European Union figurative mark Poof!...and done – European Union trade mark No 17 781 592
Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 11 October 2024 in Case R 576/2024-1
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—order EUIPO and the intervener to pay the costs of the proceedings before the General Court, as well as the costs of the invalidity and appeal proceedings before EUIPO.
Plea in law
—Infringement of the principles of protection of legitimate expectations and legal certainty related to the breach of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
—
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/1114/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—