- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case F-6/12: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 5 December 2012 — Bourtembourg v Commission (Civil Service — Officials — Expatriation allowance — Concept of habitual residence — Permanent or habitual centre of interests — Temporary residence for the purpose of study — Place where professional activity is pursued — Fixed term employment relationship)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62012FA0006
62012FA0006
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
9.2.2013
Official Journal of the European Union
C 38/32
(Case F-6/12)(<span class="super">1</span>)
(Civil Service - Officials - Expatriation allowance - Concept of habitual residence - Permanent or habitual centre of interests - Temporary residence for the purpose of study - Place where professional activity is pursued - Fixed term employment relationship)
2013/C 38/61
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: Julien Bourtembourg (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: C. Dony, lawyer)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: D. Martin and V. Joris, Agents)
Re:
Application to annul the Commission’s decision refusing to grant the applicant the expatriation allowance.
Operative part of the judgment
The Tribunal:
1.Annuls the decision of the European Commission of 24 May 2011 refusing to grant Mr Bourtembourg the expatriation allowance;
2.Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Mr Bourtembourg.
(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 184, 23.6.2012, p. 22.
* * *
Language of the case: French