I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
(Case T-32/23)
(2023/C 104/59)
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Applicant: Tradias GmbH (Frankfurt am Main, Germany) (represented by: P. Bär, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Triodos Bank NV (Zeist, Netherlands)
Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court
Trade mark at issue: Application for a European Union word mark Tradias — Application for registration No 18 262 673
Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 30 November 2022 in Case R 734/2022-1
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision, insofar as it upheld the opposition for ‘Finance Services’ in class 36 and reject the opposition in its entirety;
—order EUIPO and, as the case may be, Triodos Bank NV to pay the costs incurred before the Court and in the proceedings before EUIPO’s Board of Appeals.
—Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.