I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Community trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for Community figurative mark PROSIMA PROSIMA COMERCIAL S.A. – Earlier national word mark PROMINA – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Absence of similarity between the goods – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
Community trade mark – Definition and acquisition of the Community trade mark – Relative grounds for refusal – Opposition by the proprietor of an earlier identical or similar mark registered for identical or similar goods or services – Likelihood of confusion (Council Regulation No 40/94 Art. 8(1)(b)) (see paras 21, 39, 42)
ACTION brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 27 November 2007 (Case R 574/2007‑2) relating to opposition proceedings between Promat GmbH and Prosima Comercial, SA.
Applicant for the Community trade mark:
Prosima Comercial, SA
Community trade mark sought:
Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:
Mark or sign cited in opposition:
Word mark PROMINA for goods and services in Class 7 – German trade mark No 847011
Decision of the Opposition Division:
Opposition dismissed
Decision of the Board of Appeal:
Appeal dismissed
The Court:
Dismisses the action;
Orders Promat GmbH to pay the costs.