EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-1142/23: Judgment of the General Court of 15 January 2025 – Enedo v EUIPO – Enedis (ENEDO) (EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark ENEDO – Earlier EU word mark ENEDIS – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Restriction of the goods and services covered in the trade mark application)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62023TA1142

62023TA1142

January 15, 2025
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

C series

C/2025/1105

24.2.2025

(Case T-1142/23)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the EU word mark ENEDO - Earlier EU word mark ENEDIS - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - Restriction of the goods and services covered in the trade mark application)

(C/2025/1105)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Enedo Oyj (Vantaa, Finland) (represented by: H.-M. Elo and E. Hodge, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: A. Ringelhann, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Enedis (Paris, France) (represented by: C. Verneret and J.-B. Micard, lawyers)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment and the alteration of the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 27 September 2023 (Case R 190/2023-4).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1.Dismisses the action;

2.Orders Enedo Oyj, in addition to bearing its own costs, to pay those incurred by Enedis;

3.Orders the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) to bear its own costs.

Language of the case: English

OJ C C/2024/975, 29.1.2024.

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/1105/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

* * *

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia