I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
C series
—
24.2.2025
(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the EU word mark ENEDO - Earlier EU word mark ENEDIS - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - Restriction of the goods and services covered in the trade mark application)
(C/2025/1105)
Language of the case: English
Applicant: Enedo Oyj (Vantaa, Finland) (represented by: H.-M. Elo and E. Hodge, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: A. Ringelhann, acting as Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Enedis (Paris, France) (represented by: C. Verneret and J.-B. Micard, lawyers)
By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment and the alteration of the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 27 September 2023 (Case R 190/2023-4).
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Enedo Oyj, in addition to bearing its own costs, to pay those incurred by Enedis;
3.Orders the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) to bear its own costs.
—
Language of the case: English
OJ C C/2024/975, 29.1.2024.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/1105/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—
* * *
—