- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-7/22: Judgment of the General Court of 3 May 2023 — FFI Female Financial Invest v EUIPO — MLP Finanzberatung (Financery) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU word mark Financery — Earlier EU word mark financify — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62022TA0007
62022TA0007
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
26.6.2023
Official Journal of the European Union
C 223/22
(Case T-7/22) (*)
(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the EU word mark Financery - Earlier EU word mark financify - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
(2023/C 223/30)
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: FFI Female Financial Invest GmbH (Düsseldorf, Germany) (represented by: M. Gramsch, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: T. Klee and E. Nicolás Gómez, acting as Agents)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: MLP Finanzberatung SE (Wiesloch, Germany) (represented by: G. Hodapp, lawyer)
Re:
By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 21 October 2021 (Case R 1820/2020-5).
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders FFI Female Financial Invest GmbH to pay the costs.
(*) Language of the case: German.
* * *
(1) OJ C 84, 21.2.2022.