I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case C-36/16) (<span class="super note-tag">1</span>)
((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Taxation - Common system of value added tax - Directive 2006/112/EC - Article 2(1)(a) - Article 14(1) - Taxable transactions - Meaning of ‘supply of goods for consideration’ - Transfer to the State or to a local authority of immovable property in order to settle a tax debt - Not included))
(2017/C 239/12)
Language of the case: Polish
Applicant: Minister Finansów
Defendant: Posnania Investment SA
Articles 2(1)(a) and 14(1) of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax must be interpreted as meaning that the transfer of ownership of immovable property by a person subject to value added tax, for the benefit of the State Treasury or a local authority of a Member State, occurring, as in the main proceedings, in payment of tax arrears, does not constitute a supply of goods for consideration that is subject to value added tax.
(<span class="note">1</span>) OJ C 145, 25.4.2016.