- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-388/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d’Etat lodged on 22 July 2011 — Société le Crédit Lyonnais v Ministre du budget, des comptes publics et de la réforme de l’Etat
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62011CN0388
62011CN0388
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C 298/13
(Case C-388/11)
2011/C 298/26
Language of the case: French
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: Société le Crédit Lyonnais
Defendant: Ministre du budget, des comptes publics et de la réforme de l’Etat
Questions referred
1.Having regard to the rules on the territorial scope of value added tax, can Article 17(2) and (5) and Article 19 of the Sixth Directive 77/388/EEC be interpreted as meaning that, for calculation of the deductible proportion for which they provide, the principal establishment of a company established in a Member State must take account of the income achieved by each of its branches established in another Member State and, correspondingly, those branches must take account of the totality of income falling within the scope of value added tax achieved by the company?
2.Must the same solution be adopted for branches established outside the European Union, particularly in the light of the right to deduct provided for by Article 17(3)(a) and (c), in relation to the banking and financial operations referred to in Article 13B(d)(1) to (5), which are carried out for the benefit of customers established outside the Community?
3.Might the answer to the first two questions vary from one Member State to another, depending on the options made available by the last subparagraph of Article 17(5), particularly with regard to the establishment of different sectors of business?
4.If the answer to either of the first questions is affirmative, first, is it appropriate to limit the application of a deductible proportion of that kind to calculation of rights to deduct value added tax that has been charged on expenses incurred by the principal establishment for the benefit of foreign branches and, second, must income achieved abroad be taken into account in accordance with the rules applicable in the State of the branch or in the State of the principal establishment?
(1) Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC of 17 May 1977 on the harmonization of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes — Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment (OJ 1977 L 145, p. 1).