- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-766/21 P: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 23 January 2025 – European Parliament v Axa Assurances Luxembourg and Others (Appeal – Article 56 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union – More than one defendant in the proceedings at first instance – Judgment in default against one of those defendants which is the subject of an application before the General Court of the European Union to have it set aside – Admissibility of the appeal brought against that judgment – Conditions – Article 41 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union – Admissibility of the response to an appeal submitted by a party against which an order was made by default at first instance – Article 172 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Cross-appeal brought by a party against which an order was made by default and which has made an application to set aside to the General Court – Article 176(1) and Article 178 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Inadmissibility – Arbitration clause – Article 272 TFEU – Insurance contract concluded by the European Parliament – Exclusion clause in respect of damage relating directly or indirectly to flooding – Scope)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62021CA0766
62021CA0766
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C series
—
C/2025/1508
(Case C-766/21 P)
(<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>)
(Appeal - Article 56 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union - More than one defendant in the proceedings at first instance - Judgment in default against one of those defendants which is the subject of an application before the General Court of the European Union to have it set aside - Admissibility of the appeal brought against that judgment - Conditions - Article 41 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union - Admissibility of the response to an appeal submitted by a party against which an order was made by default at first instance - Article 172 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Cross-appeal brought by a party against which an order was made by default and which has made an application to set aside to the General Court - Article 176(1) and Article 178 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Inadmissibility - Arbitration clause - Article 272 TFEU - Insurance contract concluded by the European Parliament - Exclusion clause in respect of damage relating directly or indirectly to flooding - Scope)
(C/2025/1508)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: European Parliament (represented by: E. Paladini and B. Schäfer, and subsequently by A. Caiola and E. Paladini, acting as Agents)
Other parties to the proceedings: Axa Assurances Luxembourg SA, Bâloise Assurances Luxembourg SA, La Luxembourgeoise SA, Nationale-Nederlanden Schadeverzekering Maatschappij NV (represented by: C. Collarini and S. Denu, avocats)
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the main appeal and the cross-appeal;
2.Orders the European Parliament, Axa Assurances Luxembourg SA, Bâloise Assurances Luxembourg SA, La Luxembourgeoise SA. and Nationale-Nederlanden Schadeverzekering Maatschappij NV to pay their own costs relating to the main appeal;
3.Orders Nationale-Nederlanden Schadeverzekering Maatschappij NV to pay the costs relating to the cross-appeal.
—
(<span class="oj-super">1</span>) Language of the case: French.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/1508/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—