I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
Series C
29.1.2024
(C/2024/969)
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Applicant: Olvi Oyj (Iisalmi, Finland) (represented by: K. Rantala, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Koninklijke De Kuyper BV (Schiedam, Netherlands)
Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court
Trade mark at issue: European Union figurative mark FIZZ Cider — European Union trade mark No 1 046 531
Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 27 September 2023 in Case R 2011/2022-1
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision; and
—order EUIPO to pay the costs.
—Infringement of Article 95(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council in conjunction with Article 27(4) of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625;
—Infringement of Article 95(1) and Article 94(1) in conjunction with Article 70(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;
—Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) and Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/969/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)