EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-560/10: Action brought on 10 December 2010 — Nencini v Parliament

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62010TN0560

62010TN0560

December 10, 2010
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

C 38/17

(Case T-560/10)

2011/C 38/31

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Riccardo Nencini (Florence, Italy) (represented by: F. Bertini, lawyer)

Defendant: European Parliament

Form of order sought

Annul the decision of the Secretary-General of the European Parliament of 7 October 2010, addressed to Mr Riccardo Nencini, and Communication No 315653 of the Director General of the European Parliament’s Directorate-General for Finances of 13 October 2010 concerning ‘Recovery of undue payments in relation to the payment of parliamentary assistance and travel allowances — Debit note’, and of the following acts, already the subject of an earlier action pending before the Court in Case T-431/10: the decision of the Secretary-General of the European Parliament of 16 July 2010, addressed to the applicant and, in so far as necessary, any other acts prior to, related to or consequential upon the decision challenged in those proceedings; Communication No 312331 of the Director General of the European Parliament’s Directorate-General for Finances of 4 August 2010, addressed to Mr Riccardo Nencini and prior, related and consequential acts.

Annul the contested decision and refer the matter back to the Secretary-General of the European Parliament for a fair reassessment of the sum at issue.

In any event, order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The applicant in this case is the same applicant as in Case T-431/10 Nencini v Parliament (1).

In support of his action, the applicant puts forward pleas and arguments similar to those invoked in that case.

(1) OJ 2000 C 317, p. 40.

Language of the case: Italian

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia