- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-175/14: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof (Austria) lodged on 10 April 2014 — Ralph Prankl
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62014CN0175
62014CN0175
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
21.7.2014
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 235/3
(Case C-175/14)
2014/C 235/04
Language of the case: German
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: Ralph Prankl
Defendant: Bundesfinanzgericht
Question referred
Are Article 7(1) and (2) and Article 9(1) of Council Directive 92/12/EEC of 25 February 1992 on the general arrangements for products subject to excise duty and on the holding, movement and monitoring of such products (OJ 1992 L 76, p. 1), as amended by Council Directive 92/108/EEC of 14 December 1992 (OJ 1992 L 390, p. 1), to be interpreted as precluding national provisions which provide that where excise goods (cigarettes) have been released for consumption in a (first) Member State and, without an accompanying document in accordance with Article 7(4) of that directive, have been transported by land to another Member State (Member State of destination) through one or more other Member States (transit Member States) in order to be sold in the Member State of destination, excise duty (tobacco duty) is charged also in a transit Member State?
Language of the case: German
* * *
(1) OJ 1992 L 76, p. 1.
(2) Council Directive 92/108/EEC of 14 December 1992 amending Directive 92/12/EEC on the general arrangements for products subject to excise duty and on the holding, movement and monitoring of such products and amending Directive 92/81/EEC; OJ 1992 L 390, p. 124.