I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
C series
—
(EU trade mark - Appointment of a new representative - Applicant having ceased to respond to requests from the General Court - Article 131(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court - No need to adjudicate)
(C/2025/188)
Language of the case: English
Applicant: Nathalie Lacroix (Barcelona, Spain) (represented by: E. Sugrañes Coca and C. Sotomayor Garcia, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: R. Raponi, acting as Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Xingyu Safety Tech Co. Ltd, (Gaomi, China)
By her action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks annulment or alteration of the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 25 January 2023 (Case R 2004/2022-2) (‘the contested decision’), in so far as it dismissed her appeal in respect of the goods in Class 25.
1.There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.
2.Ms Nathalie Lacroix shall bear her own costs.
—
Language of the case: English
(1) OJ C 179, 22.5.2023.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/188/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—
* * *
—