I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
(2017/C 300/42)
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Applicant: Oy Karl Fazer Ab (Vantaa, Finland) (represented by: L. Laaksonen, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Kraft Foods Belgium Intellectual Property (Halle, Belgium)
Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant
Trade mark at issue: EU word mark ‘MIGNON’ — Application for registration No 10 995 892
Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 24 April 2017 in Case R 1859/2016-2
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—allow the trademark to be registered for all applied goods.
—Infringement of Article 8 (1) (b) of Regulation No 207/2009.