- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-417/24, Different Media: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Bacău (Romania) lodged on 11 June 2024 – Different Media SRL v Ministerul Antreprenoriatului și Turismului – Agenția pentru Întreprinderi Mici și Mijlocii, Atragere de Investiții și Promovare a Exportului Iași
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62024CN0417
62024CN0417
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C series
—
C/2024/5602
30.9.2024
(Case C-417/24, Different Media)
(C/2024/5602)
Language of the case: Romanian
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Appellant - applicant: Different Media SRL
Respondent - defendant: Ministerul Antreprenoriatului și Turismului - Agenția pentru Întreprinderi Mici și Mijlocii, Atragere de Investiții și Promovare a Exportului Iași
Questions referred
1.Does the adoption of a regulation correcting the official Romanian language version of an EU regulation, namely Commission Regulation (EU) 2021/452 correcting the Romanian language version of Regulation (EU) No 651/2014, have the effect of retroactively applying the corrected version, from the entry into force of the original regulation, or does it produce effects only for the future, after the entry into force of the correcting regulation, in a situation in which the national authorities granted State aid in accordance with the conditions laid down in the original Romanian language version of Regulation (EU) No 651/2014 and have requested, following the entry into force of Regulation (EU) 2021/452, the recovery of the State aid granted?
2.Does the equivalence of the language versions of an EU regulation mean that the national authorities of a Member State may rely, against a beneficiary of State aid granted in accordance with the original Romanian language version of Commission Regulation (EU) No 651/2014, on the provisions of Commission Regulation (EU) 2021/452 correcting the Romanian language version of Regulation (EU) No 651/2014 in order to request the recovery of State aid, in the absence of any fault on the part of the aid beneficiary?
3.Are EU law and, in particular, the principles of the protection of legitimate expectations and legal certainty, to be interpreted as precluding the recovery of State aid granted in compliance with the conditions initially laid down in the Romanian language version, conditions which, however, did not exist in the other language versions of Regulation (EU) No 651/2014, when the correction was made by means of Regulation (EU) 2021/452 to the Romanian language version after the State aid was granted?
—
Commission Regulation (EU) 2021/452 of 15 March 2021 correcting the Romanian language version of Regulation (EU) No 651/2014 declaring certain categories of aid compatible with the internal market in application of Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty (OJ 2021 L 89, p. 1).
Commission Regulation (EU) No 651/2014 of 17 June 2014 declaring certain categories of aid compatible with the internal market in application of Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty (OJ 2014 L 187, p. 1).
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/5602/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—
* * *