EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Joined Cases C-608/22 and C-609/22, Bundesamt für Fremdenwesen und Asyl and Others (Afghan women): Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 4 October 2024 (requests for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof – Austria) – AH (C-608/22), FN (C-609/22) v Bundesamt für Fremdenwesen und Asyl (References for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Common asylum policy – Directive 2011/95/EU – Conditions that must be fulfilled by third-country nationals in order to be granted refugee status – Article 2(d) and (e) – Concept of act of persecution – Level of seriousness required – Article 9 – Sufficiently severe accumulation of measures that discriminate against women – Article 9(1)(b) – Types of acts of persecution – Article 9(2) – Assessment of applications for international protection – Article 4(3) – Obligation to carry out an individual assessment – Scope)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62022CA0608

62022CA0608

October 4, 2024
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

C series

C/2024/7006

(Joined Cases C-608/22 and C-609/22, (1) Bundesamt für Fremdenwesen und Asyl and Others (Afghan women))

(References for a preliminary ruling - Area of freedom, security and justice - Common asylum policy - Directive 2011/95/EU - Conditions that must be fulfilled by third-country nationals in order to be granted refugee status - Article 2(d) and (e) - Concept of ‘act of persecution’ - Level of seriousness required - Article 9 - Sufficiently severe accumulation of measures that discriminate against women - Article 9(1)(b) - Types of acts of persecution - Article 9(2) - Assessment of applications for international protection - Article 4(3) - Obligation to carry out an individual assessment - Scope)

(C/2024/7006)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellants on a point of law: AH (C-608/22), FN (C-609/22)

Respondent: Bundesamt für Fremdenwesen und Asyl

Operative part of the judgment

1.Article 9(1)(b) of Directive 2011/95/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 December 2011 on standards for the qualification of third-country nationals or stateless persons as beneficiaries of international protection, for a uniform status for refugees or for persons eligible for subsidiary protection, and for the content of the protection granted, must be interpreted as meaning that an accumulation of discriminatory measures in respect of women – consisting, inter alia, in depriving them of any legal protection against gender-based and domestic violence and forced marriage, requiring them to cover their entire body and face, restricting their access to healthcare and freedom of movement, prohibiting them from engaging in gainful employment or limiting the extent to which they can do so, prohibiting their access to education, prohibiting them from taking part in sports and excluding them from political life – adopted or tolerated by an ‘actor of persecution’ within the meaning of Article 6 of that directive comes within the concept of ‘act of persecution’, since those measures, by their cumulative effect, undermine human dignity as guaranteed by Article 1 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.

2.Article 4(3) of Directive 2011/95 must be interpreted as not requiring the competent national authority – in order to determine whether, having regard to the conditions in a woman’s country of origin at the time of the assessment of her application for international protection, the discriminatory measures to which she has been or could be exposed to in that country amount to acts of persecution within the meaning of Article 9(1) of that directive – to take into consideration, in the individual assessment of her application for the purposes of Article 2(h) of that directive, factors particular to her personal circumstances other than those relating to her gender or nationality.

(1) OJ C 15, 16.1.2023.

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/7006/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia