- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-237/14 P: Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 6 September 2016 — Lidl Stiftung & Co. KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office (Appeal — EU trade mark — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Appeal manifestly inadmissible or manifestly unfounded)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62014CB0237
62014CB0237
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
5.12.2016
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 454/6
(Case C-237/14 P) (<span class="super note-tag">1</span>)
((Appeal - EU trade mark - Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Appeal manifestly inadmissible or manifestly unfounded))
(2016/C 454/12)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Appellant: Lidl Stiftung & Co. KG (represented by: M. Wolter, M. Kefferpütz and A.K. Marx, Rechtsanwälte)
Other party to the proceedings: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: L. Rampini, acting as Agent)
Operative part of the order
1.The appeal is dismissed.
(<span class="note"> <a id="ntr1-C_2016454EN.01000601-E0001" href="#ntc1-C_2016454EN.01000601-E0001">*1</a> </span>) OJ C 282, 25.8.2014.
* * *