- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-22/12: Action brought on 16 January 2012 — Fomanu v OHIM (Qualität hat Zukunft)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62012TN0022
62012TN0022
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
17.3.2012
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 80/22
(Case T-22/12)
2012/C 80/37
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: Fomanu AG (Neustadt a.d. Waldnaab, Germany) (represented by T. Raible)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 27 October 2011 in Case R 1518/2011-1;
—order OHIM to pay the costs of the these proceedings and those incurred before the Board of Appeal.
Pleas in law and main arguments
Community trade mark concerned: Word mark ‘Qualität hat Zukunft’ for goods and services in Classes 9, 16 and 40.
Decision of the Examiner: Registration refused.
Decision of the Board of Appeal: Appeal dismissed.
Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009, since the Community trade mark concerned is distinctive.