- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-645/16: Action brought on 7 September 2016 — Vorarlberger Landes- und Hypothekenbank v SRB
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62016TN0645
62016TN0645
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
31.10.2016
Official Journal of the European Union
C 402/55
(Case T-645/16)
(2016/C 402/65)
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: Vorarlberger Landes- und Hypothekenbank AG (Bregenz, Austria) (represented by: G. Eisenberger, lawyer)
Defendant: Single Resolution Board (SRB)
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the decision of the Single Resolution Board, apparently of 15 April 2016, at least in so far as that decision concerns the applicant;
—order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings.
Pleas in law and main arguments
In support of the action, the applicant relies on two pleas in law.
1.First plea in law: flagrant breach of essential procedural requirements by reason of a lack of (full) disclosure of the contested decision.
2.Second plea in law: flagrant breach of essential procedural requirements by reason of an inadequate statement of reasons for the contested decision.