EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-403/03: Order of the Court of First Instance of 7 January 2008 — Marmara Import-Export v OHIM — Marmara Zeytin Tarim Satis (marmara) (Community trade mark — Opposition — Withdrawal of opposition — No need to adjudicate)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62003TB0403

62003TB0403

January 1, 2003
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 64/37

(Case T-403/03)

(Community trade mark - Opposition - Withdrawal of opposition - No need to adjudicate)

(2008/C 64/60)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Marmara Import-Export GmbH (Düsseldorf, Germany) (represented by: A. von Arnswaldt and G. Rother, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: J. Weberndorfer, Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the Court of First Instance: Marmara Zeytin Tarim Satis Kooperatifleri Birligi (Bursa, Turkey) (represented by: A. Andorfer-Erhard, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 1 October 2003 (Case R 515/2002-1) concerning opposition proceedings between Marmara Import-Export GmbH and Marmara Zeytin Tarim Satis Kooperatifleri Birligi.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court orders:

1.There is no need to adjudicate on the action.

2.The applicant and the intervener shall bear their own costs and pay one half each of the defendant's costs.

(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 71, 20.3.2004.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia