I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-601/20) (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>)
(State aid - Maritime transport - Service of general economic interest - Aid granted to Adriatica for the period from January 1992 to July 1994 in relation to the Brindisi/Corfu/Igoumenitsa/Patras connection - Decision declaring the aid unlawful - Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the internal market and ordering its recovery - Interest accrued - Limitation period - New aid - Incompatibility with the internal market - Effects of a cartel on the market - Excessive duration of the procedure - Legitimate expectations - Legal certainty - Principle of good administration)
(2022/C 284/32)
Language of the case: Italian
Applicant: Tirrenia di navigazione SpA (Rome, Italy) (represented by: B. Nascimbene and F. Rossi Dal Pozzo, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: G. Braga da Cruz and D. Recchia, acting as Agents)
By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks annulment of Commission Decision (EU) 2020/1411 of 2 March 2022 on the State aid No C 64/99 (ex NN 8/99) implemented by Italy for the Adriatica, Caremar, Siremar, Saremar and Toremar shipping companies (Tirrenia Group) in so far as it concerns it.
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Tirrenia di navigazione SpA to pay the costs.
(<span class="oj-super">1</span>) OJ C 378, 9.11.2020.
Language of the case: Italian
ECLI:EU:C:2022:140