I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Community trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the Community figurative mark astex TECHNOLOGY – Earlier Community word mark ASTEX – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Restriction of the goods designated in the trade mark application – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 40/94
Community trade mark – Definition and acquisition of the Community trade mark – Relative grounds for refusal – Opposition by the proprietor of an earlier identical or similar mark registered for identical or similar goods or services – Likelihood of confusion with the earlier mark (Council Regulation No 40/94, Art. 8(1)(b)) (see paras 70-72)
Re:
ACTION brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 29 November 2005 (Case R 651/2004-2) concerning opposition proceedings between Protec Health International Ltd and Astex Therapeutics Ltd.
Applicant for the Community trade mark:
Community trade mark sought:
Figurative mark astex TECHNOLOGY for goods in Class 5
Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:
Protec Health International Ltd
Mark or sign cited in opposition:
Word mark ASTEX for goods and services in Classes 5 and 24
Decision of the Opposition Division:
Registration refused
Decision of the Board of Appeal:
Appeal dismissed
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Astex Therapeutics Ltd to pay the costs.