- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-628/18: Action brought on 22 October 2018 — E.J. Papadopoulos v EUIPO — Europastry (fripan VIENNOISERIE CAPRICE Pur Beurre)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62018TN0628
62018TN0628
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
17.12.2018
Official Journal of the European Union
C 455/31
(Case T-628/18)
(2018/C 455/41)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Viomichania mpiskoton kai eidon diatrofis E.J. Papadopoulos S.A. (Moschato-Tavros, Greece) (represented by: C. Chrysanthis, P.–V. Chardalia and A. Vasilogamvrou, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Europastry, SA (Sant Cugat del Vallès, Spain)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union figurative mark fripan VIENNOISERIE CAPRICE Pur Beurre — Application for registration No 13 125 265
Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 8 August 2018 in Case R 493/2018-5
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—order EUIPO and Europastry, SA, if it becomes intervener, to pay the costs.
Plea in law
—Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009.