I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
(2022/C 84/64)
Language of the case: English
Applicant: European Food SA (Drăgăneşti, Romania) (represented by: I. Speciac, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Société des produits Nestlé SA (Vevey, Switzerland)
Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Trade mark at issue: European Union word mark FITNESS — European Union trade mark No 2 470 326
Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 12 October 2021 in Case R 894/2020-1
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—as a secondary claim, alter the contested decision and grant the appeal filed against the decision rendered by the Cancellation Division in Cancellation Proceedings No 5 802 C;
—order EUIPO to pay the costs.
—Infringement of Article 65(6) of Regulation (EC) 207/2009 of the Council;
—Infringement of Article 76 of Regulation (EC) 207/2009 of the Council, and of rules 37 and 50(1) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 2868/95;
—Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) in conjunction with Article 52(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) 207/2009 of the Council;
—Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) in conjunction with Article 52(1)(2) of Regulation (EC) 207/2009 of the Council.