10.2.2020

Official Journal of the European Union

C 45/16

(Case C-786/19)

(2020/C 45/14)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: The North of England P & I Association Ltd., at the same time acting as legal successor for Marine Shipping Mutual Insurance Company

Defendant: Bundeszentralamt für Steuern

Question referred

Is the second indent of Article 2(d) in conjunction with the first clause of Article 25(1) of Directive 88/357/EEC (1) and/or Article 46(2) of Directive 92/49/EEC (2) with regard to the determination of the Member State where the risk is situated to be interpreted as meaning that, in the case of safeguarding against risks in connection with the operation of a seagoing vessel, the State concerned is the State in whose territory a seagoing vessel is entered in an official register for the purposes of proof of ownership, or the State whose flag is flown by the seagoing vessel?

*

Second Council Directive 88/357/EEC of 22 June 1988 on the coordination of laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to direct insurance other than life assurance and laying down provisions to facilitate the effective exercise of freedom to provide services and amending Directive 73/239/EEC (OJ 1988 L 172, p. 1).

Council Directive 92/49/EEC of 18 June 1992 on the coordination of laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to direct insurance other than life assurance and amending Directives 73/239/EEC and 88/357/EEC (third non-life insurance Directive) (OJ 1992 L 228, p. 1).