- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-209/11: Action brought on 5 April 2011 — MB System v Commission
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62011TN0209
62011TN0209
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
25.6.2011
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 186/28
(Case T-209/11)
2011/C 186/53
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: MB System GmbH & Co. KG (Nordhausen, Germany) (represented by: G. Brüggen, lawyer)
Defendant: European Commission
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul Commission Decision K(2010) 8289 final of 14 December 2010 on State aid No C 38/2005 (ex NN 52/2004) granted by Germany to the Biria Group;
—order the Commission to pay the costs.
Pleas in law and main arguments
In support of the action, the applicant relies on the following pleas in law.
1.First plea in law: wrong assessment of the facts through the classification of the undertaking as an undertaking in difficulty;
2.Second plea in law: failure to apply the 1999 Guidelines for State aid for rescue and restructuring in the classification of the undertaking as an undertaking in difficulty and examination of the value of the ‘binding comfort letter’;
3.Third plea in law: insufficient grounds for diverging from the 1999 Guidelines for State aid for rescue and restructuring in the classification as an undertaking in difficulty and examination of the value of the ‘binding comfort letter’;
4.Fourth plea in law: error of assessment in the calculation of the amount of State aid to be recovered as a result of failure to assess the ‘binding comfort letter’ in the calculation of the amount of State aid to be recovered.