I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-650/18) (*)
(EU trade mark - Application for EU word mark REAKTOR - Absolute grounds for refusal - Lack of descriptive character - Distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - Direct and specific relationship with the goods and services covered by the trade mark application)
(2019/C 413/62)
Language of the case: Finnish
Applicant: Reaktor Group Oy (Helsinki, Finland) (represented by L. Laaksonen, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: K. Kompari, acting as Agent)
Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 27 August 2018 (Case R 2626/2017-2), relating to an application for registration of the word sign REAKTOR as an EU trade mark.
The Court:
1.Annuls the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 27 August 2018 (Case R 2626/2017-2) in so far as, by that decision, the Board of Appeal dismissed the applicant’s action on the basis of Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation 2017/1001;
2.Orders EUIPO to pay the costs, including the unavoidable costs incurred by Reaktor Group Oy for the purposes of the proceedings before the Board of Appeal.
(*)
Language of the case: Finnish
* * *
(1) OJ C 16, 14.1.2019.