- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-312/19: Action brought on 21 May 2019 — Wilhelm Sihn jr. v EUIPO — Golden Frog (CHAMELEON)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62019TN0312
62019TN0312
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
8.7.2019
Official Journal of the European Union
C 230/63
(Case T-312/19)
(2019/C 230/76)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Wilhelm Sihn jr. GmbH & Co. KG (Niefern-Öschelbronn, Germany) (represented by: H. Twelmeier, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Golden Frog GmbH (Meggen, Suisse)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union word mark CHAMELEON — Application for registration No 12 567 269
Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 7 March 2019 in Case R 1551/2018-4
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—order EUIPO to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Wilhelm Sihn jr. GmbH & Co. KG;
—order Golden Frog GmbH to bear its own costs in case of an intervention.
Pleas in law
—Infringement of Article 95(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;
—Infringement of Article 27(4) of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625;
—Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.