EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-446/24: Action brought on 24 August 2024 – EV and Others v Council

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62024TN0446

62024TN0446

August 24, 2024
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

EN

C series

C/2024/5849

7.10.2024

(Case T-446/24)

(C/2024/5849)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicants: EV, EW, EY (represented by: H. over de Linden, lawyer)

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Form of order sought

The applicants claim that the Court should:

annul Article 3 ea, paragraph 3, point (a) of Council Regulation (EU) 2024/1745 of 24 June 2024 amending Regulation (EU) No 833/2014 concerning restrictive measures in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine (hereafter ‘the contested regulation’), and annul Article 4ha, paragraph 3, point (a) of Council Decision (CFSP) 2024/1744 of 24 June 2024 amending Decision 2014/512/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine (hereafter ‘the contested decision’), in so far as it concerns the addition of replicas of historical ships to the existing articles of the contested acts.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicants rely on seven pleas in law.

1.First plea in law, alleging infringement of an essential procedural requirement to state reasons.

2.Second plea in law, alleging manifest error of assessment and a lack of a solid factual basis.

3.Third plea in law, alleging illegality.

4.Fourth plea in law, alleging infringement of ownership rights and infringement of the reputation of claimant.

5.Fifth plea in law, alleging infringement of the principle of proportionality.

6.Sixth plea in law, alleging infringement of freedom to conduct a business.

7.Seventh plea in law, alleging infringement of the right to good administration and infringement of the right of effective remedy and to a fair trial.

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/5849/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia