EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-40/24: Action brought on 19 January 2024 — Instituto dos vinhos do Douro e do Porto v EUIPO — The Benriach Distillery Company (PORTSOY)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62024TN0040

62024TN0040

January 19, 2024
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

Series C

C/2024/1882

11.3.2024

(Case T-40/24)

(C/2024/1882)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Applicant: Instituto dos vinhos do Douro e do Porto I. P. (Peso da Régua, Portugal) (represented by: P. Sousa e Silva, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: The Benriach Distillery Company Ltd (Edinburgh, United Kingdom)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union word mark PORTSOY — Application for registration No 18 386 353

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 14 November 2023 in Case R 1885/2022-4

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

alter the contested decision in order to reject the trade mark application at issue;

order EUIPO and the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal to pay the costs, including those incurred by the applicant in the proceedings before the Office and the Board of Appeal.

Pleas in law

Infringement of Article 103(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to commercial use;

Infringement of Article 103(2)(a)(i) of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to comparable products;

Infringement of Article 103(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to the exploitation of the reputation of a protected designation of origin;

Infringement of Article 103(2)(b) of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to the evocation of a protected designation of origin.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia