EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case C-270/21, A (Nursery school teacher): Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 2 March 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Korkein hallinto-oikeus — Finland) — A (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Freedom of movement for workers — Recognition of professional qualifications in a Member State — Directive 2005/36/EC — Right to exercise the profession of nursery school teacher — Regulated profession — Right of access to the profession on the basis of a diploma issued in the home Member State — Professional qualification obtained in a third country)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62021CA0270

62021CA0270

March 2, 2023
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

C 155/9

(Case C-270/21, (1) A (Nursery school teacher))

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Freedom of movement for workers - Recognition of professional qualifications in a Member State - Directive 2005/36/EC - Right to exercise the profession of nursery school teacher - Regulated profession - Right of access to the profession on the basis of a diploma issued in the home Member State - Professional qualification obtained in a third country)

(2023/C 155/11)

Language of the case: Finnish

Referring court

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: A

Other party: Opetushallitus

Operative part of the judgment

1.Article 3(1)(a) of Directive 2005/36/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 September 2005 on the recognition of professional qualifications, as amended by Directive 2013/55/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 November 2013, must be interpreted as meaning that a profession in respect of which national legislation imposes qualification requirements for access to and pursuit of the profession, but leaves employers a discretion in assessing whether those requirements are met, is not to be regarded as a ‘regulated profession’ within the meaning of that provision.

2.Article 3(3) of Directive 2005/36, as amended by Directive 2013/55, must be interpreted as meaning that that provision is not applicable where the evidence of formal qualifications presented to the host Member State was obtained on the territory of another Member State at a time when that other Member State existed not as an independent State but as a Soviet Socialist Republic, and where that evidence of formal qualifications was regarded by that Member State as evidence of formal qualifications issued by that Member State after it had regained its independence. Such evidence of formal qualifications must be regarded as having been obtained in a Member State and not in a third country.

(1) OJ C 263, 5.7.2021.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia