- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-144/21: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 20 April 2023 — European Parliament v European Commission (Action for annulment — Implementing Decision C(2020) 8797 — Authorisation of certain uses of chromium trioxide — Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 — Registration, evaluation, authorisation and restriction of chemicals — Article 60 — Granting of authorisations — Obligation to demonstrate that socio-economic benefits outweigh the risk to human health or the environment arising from the use of the substance and that there are no suitable alternative substances or technologies — Article 62 — Applications for authorisation — Article 64 — Procedure for authorisation decisions)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62021CA0144
62021CA0144
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
12.6.2023
Official Journal of the European Union
C 205/3
(Case C-144/21) (1)
(Action for annulment - Implementing Decision C(2020) 8797 - Authorisation of certain uses of chromium trioxide - Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 - Registration, evaluation, authorisation and restriction of chemicals - Article 60 - Granting of authorisations - Obligation to demonstrate that socio-economic benefits outweigh the risk to human health or the environment arising from the use of the substance and that there are no suitable alternative substances or technologies - Article 62 - Applications for authorisation - Article 64 - Procedure for authorisation decisions)
(2023/C 205/03)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: European Parliament (represented by: C. Ionescu Dima, M. Menegatti and L. Visaggio, acting as Agents)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: R. Lindenthal and K. Mifsud-Bonnici, acting as Agents)
Intervener in support of the defendant: European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) (represented by: W. Broere, M. Heikkilä and T. Zbihlej, acting as Agents)
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Annuls Article 1(1) and (5) and Articles 2 to 5, 7, 9 and 10 of Commission Implementing Decision C(2020) 8797 of 18 December 2020 partially granting an authorisation for certain uses of chromium trioxide under Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council (Chemservice GmbH and others), inasmuch as those articles concern the authorisation for uses 2, 4 and 5, as well as use 1 in relation to the formulation of mixtures for uses 2, 4 and 5;
2.Declares that the effects of Implementing Decision C(2020) 8797 are to be maintained for a period not exceeding one year from the date of delivery of the present judgment;
3.Orders the European Commission to pay the costs.
* Language of the case: English.
(1) OJ C 163, 3.5.2021.