I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-477/10) (*)
(Community trade mark - Opposition procedure - Application for Community figurative mark SE© SPORTS EQUIPMENT - Prior national word mark SE So Easy - Relative grounds for refusal - Similarity of the signs - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009)
(2012/C 25/95)
Language of the case: German
Applicant: SE — Blusen Stenau GmbH (Gronau, Germany) (represented by: O. Bischof, lawyer)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: A. Pohlmann, Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Sport Eybl & Sports Experts GmbH (Wels, Austria) (represented by: M. Pachinger and S. Fürst., lawyers)
Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 22 July 2010 (Case R 139372009-1) concerning an opposition procedure between SE — Blusen Stenau GmbH and Sport Eybl & Sports Experts GmbH.
The Court:
1.Annuls the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 22 July 2010 (Case R 139372009-1);
2.Orders OHIM to bear its own costs and pay the costs incurred by SE — Blusen Stenau GmbH;
3.Orders Sport Eybl & Sports Experts GmbH to bear its own costs.
*
Language of the case: German.
OJ C 346, 18.12.2010