I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-30/22) (*)
(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Withdrawal of the application for registration - No need to adjudicate)
(2022/C 359/92)
Language of the case: English
Applicant: Sanoptis Sàrl (Luxembourg, Luxembourg) (represented by: S. Rost, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Gája, acting as Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Synoptis Pharma sp. z o.o. (Warsaw, Poland)
By its action based on Article 263 TFEU, the applicant, Sanoptis Sàrl, seeks annulment of the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 18 November 2021 (Case R 850/2021-4).
1.There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.
2.Sanoptis Sàrl shall pay the costs.
(*)
Language of the case: English
(1)
OJ C 119, 14.3.2022.