- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-787/21: Action brought on 21 December 2021 — UniSkin v EUIPO — Unicskin (UNISKIN by Dr. Søren Frankild)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62021TN0787
62021TN0787
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
14.2.2022
Official Journal of the European Union
C 73/57
(Case T-787/21)
(2022/C 73/72)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: UniSkin ApS (Silkeborg, Denmark) (represented by: M. Hoffgaard Rasmussen, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Unicskin, SL (Madrid, Spain)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court
Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union figurative mark UNISKIN by Dr. Søren Frankild — Application for registration No 18 153 435
Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 20 October 2021 in Case R 771/2021-4
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision and, subsequently, reject the opposition against the trade mark in its entirety;
Plea in law
—Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.