- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-350/24, Crédit Agricole Corporate & Investment Bank: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (France) lodged on 14 May 2024 – HJ v Crédit Agricole Corporate & Investment Bank
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62024CN0350
62024CN0350
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C series
—
C/2024/5074
26.8.2024
(Case C-350/24, Crédit Agricole Corporate & Investment Bank)
(C/2024/5074)
Language of the case: French
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Appellant: HJ
Respondent: Crédit Agricole Corporate & Investment Bank
Questions referred
1.Must the Agreement on the withdrawal of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland from the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community (Euratom), approved by the Council of the European Union by Decision (EU) 2020/135 of 30 January 2020, (1) be interpreted as meaning that United Kingdom legislation transposing Article 19 of Directive 2006/54/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 July 2006 on the implementation of the principle of equal opportunities and equal treatment of men and women in matters of employment and occupation (2) must be regarded as legislation of a Member State transposing a directive, by a court giving its ruling after the end of the transition period, where the facts are prior to that date and/or the proceedings were brought before that date?
2.Must Article 288 TFEU be interpreted as meaning that a national court hearing a dispute between individuals, which is obliged to apply the law of another Member State, must interpret the provisions of that law in conformity with a directive, without this being precluded by the principle of mutual trust?
3.If the national court considers that it is impossible to interpret those provisions in conformity with the directive, must it disapply that law, as it would do with its own national law, where a general principle of EU law or a provision of primary law, as given concrete expression in a directive, is at issue?
—
Decision (EU) 2020/135 of 30 January 2020 on the conclusion of the Agreement on the withdrawal of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland from the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community (OJ 2020 L 29, p. 1).
OJ 2006 L 204, p. 23.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/5074/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—
*
Language of the case: French.
—
*