EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-227/21: Judgment of the General Court of 13 July 2022 — Illumina v Commission (Competition — Concentrations — Pharmaceutical industry market — Article 22 of Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 — Referral request from a competition authority not having jurisdiction under national law to examine the concentration — Commission decision to examine the concentration — Commission decisions accepting requests from other national competition authorities to join the referral request — Competence of the Commission — Time limit for submitting the referral request — Concept of ‘made known’ — Reasonable time — Legitimate expectations — Public statements by the Vice-President of the Commission — Legal certainty)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62021TA0227

62021TA0227

July 13, 2022
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

19.9.2022

Official Journal of the European Union

C 359/66

(Case T-227/21) (*)

(Competition - Concentrations - Pharmaceutical industry market - Article 22 of Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 - Referral request from a competition authority not having jurisdiction under national law to examine the concentration - Commission decision to examine the concentration - Commission decisions accepting requests from other national competition authorities to join the referral request - Competence of the Commission - Time limit for submitting the referral request - Concept of ‘made known’ - Reasonable time - Legitimate expectations - Public statements by the Vice-President of the Commission - Legal certainty)

(2022/C 359/80)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Illumina, Inc. (Wilmington, Delaware, United States) (represented by: D. Beard, Barrister, and P. Chappatte, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: N. Khan, G. Conte and C. Urraca Caviedes, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the applicant: Grail LLC, formerly Grail, Inc. (Menlo Park, California, United States) (represented by: D. Little, Solicitor, J. Ruiz Calzado, J.M. Jiménez-Laiglesia Oñate and A. Giraud, lawyers)

Interveners in support of the defendant: Hellenic Republic (represented by: K. Boskovits, acting as Agent), French Republic (represented by: T. Stéhelin, P. Dodeller, J.-L. Carré and E. Leclerc, acting as Agents), Kingdom of the Netherlands (represented by: M. Bulterman and P. Huurnink, acting as Agents), EFTA Surveillance Authority (represented by: C. Simpson, M. Sánchez Rydelski and M.-M. Joséphidès, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU seeking the annulment, first, of Commission Decision C(2021) 2847 final of 19 April 2021, accepting the request of the Autorité de la concurrence française (French Competition Authority) to examine the concentration relating to the acquisition by Illumina, Inc. of sole control over Grail, Inc. (Case COMP/M.10188 — Illumina/Grail), second, of Commission Decisions C(2021) 2848 final, C(2021) 2849 final, C(2021) 2851 final, C(2021) 2854 final and C(2021) 2855 final of 19 April 2021, accepting the requests of the Greek, Belgian, Norwegian, Icelandic and Dutch competition authorities to join that referral request, and third, of the Commission's letter of 11 March 2021 informing Illumina and Grail of that referral request.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1.Dismisses the action;

2.Orders Illumina, Inc. to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission;

3.Orders the Hellenic Republic, the French Republic, the Kingdom of the Netherlands, the EFTA Surveillance Authority and Grail LLC to bear their own costs.

*

Language of the case: English.

(1) OJ C 252, 28.6.2021.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia