I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case C-310/19 P) (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>)
(Appeal - Civil service - Contract staff - Recruitment procedure - Classification in grade - Conditions of Employment of Other Servants - Article 86 - European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) - General implementing provisions - Challenge of the proposed classification - Withdrawal of the offer of employment - Action for compensation - Principle of sound administration - Duty to have regard for the welfare of staff - Breach of administrative duty - Non-contractual liability of the European Union - Non-material damage - Compensation)
(2020/C 262/10)
Language of the case: French
Appellant: Boudewijn Schokker (represented by: T. Martin and S. Orlandi, avocats)
Other party to the proceedings: European Union Aviation Safety Agency (represented by: S. Rostren, acting as Agent, and D. Waelbroeck and A. Duron, avocats)
The Court:
1.Annuls the order of the General Court of the European Union of 8 February 2019, Schokker v EASA (T-817/17, not published, EU:T:2019:74);
2.Orders the European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) to pay compensation in the sum of EUR 7 500 to Mr Boudewijn Schokker;
3.Orders the European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) to pay its own costs relating to the proceedings at first instance in Case T-817/17 and the appeal proceedings as well as those incurred by Mr Boudewijn Schokker relating to both those proceedings.
(<span class="oj-super">1</span>) OJ C 255, 29.7.2019.
* Language of the case: French.