- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-597/12 P: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 17 October 2013 — Isdin, SA v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs), Bial-Portela & Ca SA (Appeal — Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community word mark ZEBEXIR — Earlier word mark ZEBINIX — Relative grounds for refusal — Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Article 8(1)(b) — Obligation to state reasons)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62012CA0597
62012CA0597
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
14.12.2013
Official Journal of the European Union
C 367/20
(Case C-597/12 P) (<span class="super">1</span>)
(Appeal - Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community word mark ZEBEXIR - Earlier word mark ZEBINIX - Relative grounds for refusal - Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Article 8(1)(b) - Obligation to state reasons)
2013/C 367/35
Language of the case: English
Parties
Appellant: Isdin, SA (represented by: G. Marín Raigal and P. López Ronda, abogados)
Other parties to the proceedings: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: P. Geroulakos, Agent), Bial-Portela & Ca, SA
Re:
Appeal brought against the judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 9 October 2012 in Case T-366/11 Bial-Portela v OHIM — Isdin (ZEBEXIR); by which the General Court annulled Decision R 1212/2009-1 of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (OHIM) of 6 April 2011, dismissing the action brought against the Opposition Division’s decision which rejected the opposition brought by the owner of the Community word mark ‘ZEBENIX’ in respect of goods and services classified in Classes 3, 5 and 42, against the application for registration of the word mark ‘ZEBEXIR’ in respect of goods classified in Classes 3 and 5 — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Likelihood of confusion
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Sets aside the judgment of the General Court of the European Union of 9 October 2012 in Case T-366/11 Bial-Portela v OHIM — Isdin (ZEBEXIR);
2.Refers the case back to the General Court of the European Union;
3.Reserves the costs.
(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 86, 23.3.2013.