EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case C-519/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Hannover (Germany) lodged on 15 October 2020 — K

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62020CN0519

62020CN0519

October 15, 2020
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

18.1.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 19/19

(Case C-519/20)

(2021/C 19/25)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: K

Party to the proceedings: Landkreis Gifhorn

Questions referred

1.Must EU law, in particular Article 18(1) and (3) of Directive 2008/115/EC (1), be interpreted as meaning that a national court deciding on detention for the purpose of removal must, in each individual case, examine the conditions laid down in that provision, in particular whether the exceptional situation persists, where the national legislature, on the basis of Article 18(1), has derogated from the conditions laid down in Article 16(1) in national law?

2.Must EU law, in particular Article 16(1) of Directive 2008/115/EC, be interpreted as precluding national legislation which on a temporary basis, until 1 July 2022, allows the placement of detainees awaiting removal in a prison facility despite specialised detention facilities being provided in the Member State and despite the fact that there is no emergency situation within the meaning of Article 18(1) of Directive 2008/115/EC which would make that absolutely necessary?

3.Must Article 16(1) of Directive 2008/115/EC be interpreted as meaning that a ‘specialised detention facility’ to detain persons awaiting removal is not deemed to exist merely because:

— the ‘specialised detention facility’ indirectly is subject to supervision by the same government body as detention facilities for prisoners, namely the Minister for Justice,

— the ‘specialised detention facility’ is organised as a division of a prison and, while it has its own governor, is under the overall management of the prison facility as it is one of a number of divisions of that prison?

4.If Question 3 is answered in the negative:

Must Article 16(1) of Directive 2008/115/EC be interpreted as meaning that accommodation in a ‘specialised detention facility’ for detainees awaiting removal exists if a prison facility sets up a specific division as a detention facility, if that division operates for detainees awaiting removal a specific area with three buildings within the perimeter fence and one of those three buildings temporarily solely houses prisoners serving custodial sentences for default of payment of a fine or short custodial sentences, where the prison facility takes care to ensure detainees awaiting removal are separated from prisoners and where, in particular, every house has its own facilities (its own clothing store, medical facilities, gym) and, while the yard/outside space is visible from all houses, each house has its own area for use by the detainees which is fenced off with a wire-mesh fence that prevents direct access between houses?

(1) Directive 2008/115/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2008 on common standards and procedures in Member States for returning illegally staying third-country nationals (OJ 2008 L 348, p. 98).

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia