- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-519/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Okręgowy w Warszawie (Poland) lodged on 9 July 2019 — Passenger Rights spółka akcyjna, with its seat in Warsaw v Ryanair DAC, with its seat in Dublin (Ireland)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62019CN0519
62019CN0519
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
7.10.2019
Official Journal of the European Union
C 337/7
(Case C-519/19)
(2019/C 337/08)
Language of the case: Polish
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: Passenger Rights SA
Defendant: Ryanair DAC, with its seat in Dublin (Ireland)
Questions referred
Should Articles 2(b), 3(1) and (2) and 6(1) of Council Directive 93/13/EEC (1) of 5 April 1993 on unfair terms in consumer contracts and Article 25 of Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 (2) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2012 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters — as regards examination of the validity of an agreement conferring jurisdiction — be interpreted as meaning that the final purchaser of a claim acquired by way of assignment from a consumer, which final purchaser is not a consumer himself, may rely on the absence of individual negotiation of contractual terms and on unfair contractual terms arising from a jurisdiction clause?
(1) Council Directive 93/13/EEC of 5 April 1993 on unfair terms in consumer contracts (OJ 1993 L 95, p. 29).
(2) OJ 2012 L 351, p. 1.
* * *