- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-68/21: Action brought on 28 January 2021 — QA v Commission
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62021TN0068
62021TN0068
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
19.4.2021
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 138/43
(Case T-68/21)
(2021/C 138/58)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: QA (represented by: C. Roth, lawyer)
Defendant: European Commission
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—order the European Commission to pay a sum of EUR 397 038,30 [to QA] on account of the material damage she suffered as a result of the infringement by the Commission of the principles of proportionality, good administration and the rights of the defence, as derived from European Union law;
—order the European Commission to pay a sum of EUR 100 000 [to QA] on account of the non-material damage she suffered as a result of the infringement of the principle of proportionality, as derived from European Union law;
—order the European Commission to pay the costs, including non-recoverable expenses.
Pleas in law and main arguments
In support of the action, the applicant relies on four pleas in law, the first three of which concern the material damage which she has allegedly suffered due to a shortfall in her present and future remuneration, and the fourth concerns the non-material damage which she allegedly suffered due to injury to her reputation.
1.First plea in law, alleging infringement of the principle of proportionality by the European Commission, which thus constitutes an unlawful act for which the Commission is responsible and which caused damage to the applicant.
2.Second plea in law, alleging non-observance of the rights of the defence by the European Commission, which thus constitutes an unlawful act for which the Commission is responsible and which caused damage to the applicant.
3.Third plea in law, alleging infringement of the principle of good administration by the European Commission, which thus constitutes an unlawful act for which the Commission is responsible and which caused damage to the applicant.
4.Fourth plea in law, alleging infringement of the principle of proportionality by the European Commission, which thus constitutes an unlawful act for which the Commission is responsible and which caused damage to the applicant.