- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-125/22 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 30 March 2022 — RT France v Council (Interim relief — Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine — Suspension of the broadcasting activities of certain media — Application for suspension of operation of a measure — No urgency — Weighing of competing interests)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62022TB0125
62022TB0125
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C 213/41
(Case T-125/22 R)
(Interim relief - Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures taken in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine - Suspension of the broadcasting activities of certain media - Application for suspension of operation of a measure - No urgency - Weighing of competing interests)
(2022/C 213/57)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: RT France (Boulogne-Billancourt, France) (represented by: E. Piwnica, lawyer)
Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: S. Lejeune, R. Meyer and S. Emmerechts, acting as Agents)
Re:
Application pursuant to Articles 278 and 279 TFEU for suspension of the operation of Council Decision (CFSP) 2022/351 of 1 March 2022 amending Decision 2014/512/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine (OJ 2022 L 65, p. 5) and of Council Regulation (EU) 2022/350 of 1 March 2022 amending Regulation (EU) No 833/2014 concerning restrictive measures in view of Russia's actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine (OJ 2022 L 65, p. 1), in so far as those acts concern the applicant.
Operative part of the order
1.The application for interim relief is dismissed.
2.There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the applications for leave to intervene submitted by the European Commission, the Kingdom of Belgium, the French Republic and the Republic of Poland.
3.The costs are reserved save for those incurred by the European Commission, the Kingdom of Belgium, the French Republic and the Republic of Poland. Those parties shall bear the costs in the context of their application for leave to intervene.