- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-50/09: Judgment of the General Court of 15 March 2011 — Ifemy’s v OHIM — Dada & Co Kids (Dada & Co. kids) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community figurative mark Dada & Co. kids — Earlier national word mark DADA — Relative ground for refusal — Absence of genuine use of the earlier mark — Article 43(2) and (3) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 42(2) and (3) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62009TA0050
62009TA0050
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
30.4.2011
Official Journal of the European Union
C 130/15
(Case T-50/09) (<span class="super">1</span>)
(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community figurative mark Dada & Co. kids - Earlier national word mark DADA - Relative ground for refusal - Absence of genuine use of the earlier mark - Article 43(2) and (3) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 42(2) and (3) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))
2011/C 130/26
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Ifemy’s Holding GmbH (Munich, Germany) (represented by: H.-G. Augustinowski, lawyer)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (represented by: A. Folliard-Monguiral, Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Dada & Co. Kids Srl (Prato, Italy)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 27 November 2008 (Case R 911/2008-4), relating to opposition proceedings between Ifemy’s Holding GmbH and Dada & Co. Kids Srl.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Ifemy’s Holding GmbH to pay the costs.
Language of the case: English
*
(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 90, 18.4.2009.