- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-639/21: Action brought on 4 October 2021 — CB v EUIPO — China Construction Bank (CCB)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62021TN0639
62021TN0639
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
29.11.2021
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 481/38
(Case T-639/21)
(2021/C 481/52)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Groupement des cartes bancaires (CB) (Paris, France) (represented by: C. Herissay-Ducamp, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: China Construction Bank Corp. (Beijing, China)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union figurative mark CCB — Application for registration No 13 359 609
Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 30 July 2021 in Case R 1305/2020-2
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision, uphold the opposition and reject the application for trade mark No 13 359 609;
—order EUIPO to pay the costs.
Pleas in law
—Infringement of Article 94 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;
—Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;
—Infringement of Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.