- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-277/19: Judgment of the General Court of 24 March 2021 — BK v EASO (Civil service — Temporary agents — Temporary reassignment — Action for annulment — Purely confirmatory measure — Inadmissibility — Explicit decision rejecting the complaint — Autonomous scope — Suspension of the effects of the decision subject to the complaint — Interest in bringing proceedings — Action for damages — Close link to the claim for annulment — No pre-litigation procedure — Inadmissibility)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62019TA0277
62019TA0277
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C 217/37
(Case T-277/19) (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>)
(Civil service - Temporary agents - Temporary reassignment - Action for annulment - Purely confirmatory measure - Inadmissibility - Explicit decision rejecting the complaint - Autonomous scope - Suspension of the effects of the decision subject to the complaint - Interest in bringing proceedings - Action for damages - Close link to the claim for annulment - No pre-litigation procedure - Inadmissibility)
(2021/C 217/48)
Language of the case: Greek
Parties
Applicant: BK (represented by: V. Christianos, A. Skoulikis and D. Karagkounis, lawyers)
Defendant: European Asylum Support Office (represented by: P. Eyckmans and A. Stamatopoulou, acting as Agents, assisted by D. Waelbroeck and A. Duron, lawyers)
Re:
Application under Article 270 TFEU seeking, first, annulment of the decision of EASO of 20 September 2018 to assign the applicant to Malta from 1 November 2018, of the implied decision rejecting the complaint directed against that decision and of the decision of EASO of 6 June 2019 explicitly rejecting that complaint and, second, compensation for the material and non-material damage allegedly suffered by the applicant following that latter decision.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders BK to bear half of her own costs;
3.Orders the European Asylum Support Office (EASO) to bear its own costs and to pay half of the costs incurred by BK.
(<span class="oj-super">1</span>) OJ C 213, 24.6.2019.