I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
C series
—
(Civil service - Officials - Remuneration - Family allowances - Refusal to grant - Withdrawal of the contested measure - Action which has become devoid of purpose - No need to adjudicate)
(C/2024/4730)
Language of the case: French
Applicant: CN (represented by: N. de Montigny, lawyer)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: G. Niddam, M. Brauhoff and L. Hohenecker, acting as Agents)
By her action under Article 270 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of Commission Decision Ares (2023) 3230522 of 8 May 2023, refusing to grant her the double dependent child allowance, and, in so far as necessary, of the decision of 29 November 2023 rejecting the complaint against the contested measure.
1.There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.
2.The European Commission is ordered to pay the costs.
—
Language of the case: French.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/4730/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—
* * *
(<span class="oj-super">1</span>) OJ C C/2024/2637, 22.4.2024.
—
—