I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
—
(2019/C 432/79)
Language of the case: English
Applicant: Frank Recruitment Group Services Ltd (Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom) (represented by: J. Dennis, Solicitor)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Pearson plc (London, United Kingdom)
Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court
Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union word mark PEARSON FRANK – Application for registration No 15 841 851
Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 26 August 2019 in Case R 1884/2018-4
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—order EUIPO to pay the applicant’s costs.
—Infringement of Article 94 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;
—Infringement of Article 95 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;
—Infringement of Article 47(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;
—Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
—Infringement of Article 47(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
—